Back Aa

Domestic Slave Trade Of The Southern States

CHAPTER V. THE KIDNAPPING AND SELLING OF FREE NEGROES INTO SLAVERY. Virginia, as early as 1753, enacted a law against importation of free negroes for sale and stealing of slaves.[220] In 1788 another law was passed against kidnapping. It recited that several evil-disposed persons had seduced or stolen children or mulatto and black free persons; and that there was no law adequate for such offenses. This law made the penalty for such a crime very severe. Upon conviction the offender was to suffer death without benefit of clergy.[221] North Carolina had already (1779) enacted a law, with the same penalty, against stealing slaves and kidnapping free negroes.[222] The other Southern States which had laws[Pg 85] against kidnapping are: Alabama,[223] Maryland,[224] Mississippi,[225] Missouri,[226] Florida,[227] South Carolina,[228] Arkansas,[229] Tennessee,[230] Louisiana,[231] Georgia.[232] Delaware, however, had the most interesting as well as very severe laws against kidnapping. That of 1793 required that any one guilty of kidnapping or of assisting to kidnap free negroes or mulattoes should be whipped with thirty-nine lashes on the bare back, and stand in the pillory with both of his ears nailed to it,[Pg 86] and when he came out to have their soft parts cut off.[233] In 1826 the penalties were made even more severe: $1,000 fine, pillory one hour, to be whipped with sixty lashes upon the bare back, to be imprisoned from three to seven years, at the expiration of which he was to be disposed of as a servant for seven years, and upon second conviction to suffer death.[234] In 1831 Congress passed a law to prevent the abduction and sale of free negroes from the District of Columbia.[235] It is quite evident from these laws that kidnapping was a very common crime. It does not appear, however, that they prevented it. Even as early as 1817 it was estimated by Torrey, who seems to have made a study of the subject, that several thousand legally free persons were toiling in servitude, having been kidnapped.[236] Free negro children were the ones who were[Pg 87] most liable to be kidnapped,[237] for the reason probably that they were easier managed and less likely to have about them proofs of their freedom, though sometimes, indeed, even white children, whether being mistaken for negroes or not, were stolen and sold into slavery.[238] More than twenty free colored children were kidnapped in Philadelphia in 1825.[239] It is stated that some persons gained a livelihood by stealing negroes from the towns of the North and carrying them to the South for sale.[240] Statements similar to the following are often to be met with in the papers published in slavery times: "Four negro children, 18, 17, 9 and 5 years respectively—first two girls; last two boys—were kidnapped and carried off from Gallatin[Pg 88] County, Illinois, on the evening of 5 ult. The father ... was tied while the children were taken away. The kidnapping gang is regularly organized and is increasing. The members are well known but cannot be punished on account of the disqualification of negroes as witnesses."[241] "About midnight on the 27th of September a party of 8 or 10 Kentuckians broke into the house of a Mr. Powell, in Cass County, Michigan, while he was absent. They drew their pistols and bowie knives and dragged his wife and three children from their beds, and bound them with cords and hurried them off to their covered wagons and started post haste for Kentucky."[242] Probably kidnapping was carried on even more extensively in the slave States themselves. "The[Pg 89] Liberator," quoting from the "Denton (Md.) Journal" in 1849 says: "Three free negro youths, a girl and two boys, were kidnapped and taken from the County with intent to sell them to the South.... They had been hired for a few days by Mr. James T. Wooters, near Denton, for the ostensible purpose of cutting cornstalks. After being a day or two in Mr. Wooters' employ they suddenly disappeared.... Enquiry being set on foot, it was, after some days, discovered that they had been secretly carried through Hunting Creek towards Worcester County, thence to Virginia. We learn that the Negroes are now in Norfolk."[243] They were carried to Richmond where they were sold as slaves, but were finally recovered.[244] Notwithstanding the harshness of the Delaware laws against kidnapping and the convictions[245] under them, the business of kidnapping seems to have flourished there. A quotation or two will illustrate: "Two young colored men, free born, were[Pg 90] stolen from Wilmington a few nights ago and taken, it is supposed, to some of the Southern slave markets.... Fifty or sixty persons it is said, have been stolen from the lower part of the State in the last six months."[246] In 1840 the "Baltimore Sun" said: "A most villainous system of kidnapping has been extensively carried on in the State of Delaware by a gang of scoundrels residing there, aided and abetted by a number of confederates living on the Eastern Shore of this State."[247] While discussing kidnapping in Delaware, it is very unlikely we should forget to mention probably the most notorious kidnapping gang which the domestic slave trade produced. The principal character of the gang, and the one from which it seems to have drawn its inspiration, and the one from which it took its name—was a woman—in looks more like a man than a woman—Patty Cannon by name—well known by tradition[Pg 91] to every Delawarian and Eastern Shore of Marylander. A son-in-law of hers was hanged for the murder of a negro trader. His widow then married one Joe Johnson who became a noted character in the business of kidnapping through the aid and instruction of his mother-in-law, Patty Cannon. Johnson was convicted once and suffered the punishment of the lash and pillory. The grand jury in May, 1829, found three indictments for murder against Patty Cannon,[248] but she died in jail May 11, of the same year.[249] White kidnappers sometimes used free colored men as tools by means of which to ensnare other free colored men, and shared with them the[Pg 92] profits of the trade.[250] Indeed, the free colored men seem not to have been much averse in aiding in the enslavement of their "brethren." They sometimes even formed kidnapping bands of their own and pursued the business without the aid of white men. Such a gang as this once operated near Snow Hill, Maryland. It is said to have kidnapped and sent off several hundred free negroes.[251] Kidnappers devised various schemes for the accomplishment of their purposes, some of them no less humorous than infamous. A man in Philadelphia was found to be engaged in the occupation of courting and marrying mulatto wo[Pg 93]men and then selling them as slaves.[252] Another plan was for one or two confederates to find out the bodily marks of a suitable free colored person after which the other confederate would go before a magistrate and lay claim to the ill-fated negro, describing his marks, call in his accomplice as witness and so get possession of the negroes.[253] Probably the most ingenious of all methods of kidnapping was that brought to light in Charleston, South Carolina, as related by Francis Hall: "The agents were a justice of the peace, a constable and a slave dealer.... A victim having been selected, one of the firm applied to the justice upon a shown charge of assault, or similar offense, for a writ, which was immediately issued and served by the constable, and the negro conveyed to prison.... The constable now appears, exaggerates the dangers of his situation, explains how small is his chance of being liberated even if innocent, by reason of the[Pg 94] amount of jail fees and other legal expenses; but he knows a worthy man who is interested in his behalf, and will do what is necessary to procure his freedom upon no harder condition than an agreement to serve him for a certain number of years. It may be supposed the negro is persuaded.... The worthy slave dealer now appears on the stage, the indenture of bondage is ratified in the presence of the worthy magistrate and the constable, who shares the price of blood, and the victim is hurried on shipboard to be seen no more."[254] From the nature of our information concerning kidnapping it is readily seen that we have but little basis for a statistical estimate of the number kidnapped. It must have ranged, however, from a few hundred to two or three thousand annually. It appears quite certain that as many were kidnapped as escaped from bondage, if not more. The "Liberator" alone records nearly a hundred cases of detected kidnapping between 1831[Pg 95] and 1860. But the number detected probably bears but little relation to the number actually kidnapped. As was before shown in the cases mentioned almost whole families were carried off, and that in most cases, when a discovery was made, it was found that the kidnapping gang had been in the business for years. <div class="footnotes">FOOTNOTES: <div class="footnote"> [220] Hening: Statutes at Large, Vol. VI., p. 357. </div> <div class="footnote"> [221] Ibid., Vol. XII., p. 531. </div> <div class="footnote"> [222] Laws of State of North Carolina. Revised Under Authority of the General Assembly, Vol. I., p. 375. </div> <div class="footnote"> [223] Acts of General Assembly of Alabama, 1840-41, p. 125. </div> <div class="footnote"> [224] Maxcy: Revised Laws of Maryland, Vol. II., p. 356 (1811). Dorsey: General Public Statuary Law, Vol. I., p. 112. </div> <div class="footnote"> [225] Hutchinson: Code of Mississippi (1798 to 1848), p. 960. Revised Code of Mississippi, Authority of Legislature (1857), p. 603. </div> <div class="footnote"> [226] Laws of State of Missouri Revised by Legislature (1825), Vol. I., p. 289. </div> <div class="footnote"> [227] Laws of Florida, 1850-51, p. 132-3. </div> <div class="footnote"> [228] Laws of South Carolina, 1837, p. 58. </div> <div class="footnote"> [229] English: Digest of Statutes of Arkansas (1848) Authority of Leg. Chap. LI., p. 333. </div> <div class="footnote"> [230] Hurd: Law of Freedom and Bondage, Vol. II., p. 92. </div> <div class="footnote"> [231] Laws of a Public and General Nature of the District of Louisiana, of Territory of Louisiana and Territory of Missouri and State of Missouri to 1824 (passed Oct. 1, 1804). </div> <div class="footnote"> [232] Hurd: Vol. II., p. 106. </div> <div class="footnote"> [233] Laws of State of Delaware, Oct. 14, 1793. Hurd, Vol. IV. p. 76. </div> <div class="footnote"> [234] Passed Feb. 8, 1826. Laws of Delaware, Vol. VI., p. 715. </div> <div class="footnote"> [235] Statutes at Large, Vol. V., p. 450. </div> <div class="footnote"> [236] Jessie Torrey: A Portraiture of Domestic Slavery, p. 57. </div> <div class="footnote"> [237] An address to the People of North Carolina, p. 38. (Y.) Sl. Pamp., Vol. LXI. Liberator: May 18, 1849. Niles' Reg., Feb. 25, 1826. </div> <div class="footnote"> [238] Emancipator, March 8, 1848. </div> <div class="footnote"> [239] Mrs. Childs: Anti-Slavery Catechism, p. 14. (Yale) Slavery Pamp., Vol. LXII. </div> <div class="footnote"> [240] Buckingham: The Eastern and Western States of America, Vol. I., p. 11. Niles' Reg., Oct. 18, 1828. Liberator, Oct. 1, 1852, Aug. 14, 1857. Alexander, Transatlantic Sketches, p. 230. </div> <div class="footnote"> [241] Liberator, May 18, 1849. </div> <div class="footnote"> [242] Ibid., Nov. 23, 1849. Other cases: Liberator, July 31, 1846; Sept. 5, 1845; Oct. 1. 1852; Dec. 3, 1841; Aug. 14, 1857; Aug. 15, 1856; April 25, 1835; Jan. 10, 1835; May 7, 1835; Nov. 6, 1846; Niles' Reg., Sept. 27, 1817; Jan. 31, 1818; May 23, 1818; July 4, 1818; Dec. 12, 1818; Feb. 25, 1826; June 28, 1828. W. Faux, Memorable Days in America, p. 277. Several of these as given took place in slave States. </div> <div class="footnote"> [243] Liberator, April 27, 1849. </div> <div class="footnote"> [244] Ibid., June 8, 1849. </div> <div class="footnote"> [245] North Carolina Standard, June 21, 1837. Niles' Register, April 25, 1829. </div> <div class="footnote"> [246] The Christian Citizen, Dec. 21, 1844. Quoting from Penn. Freeman. </div> <div class="footnote"> [247] Liberator, Feb. 21, 1840. </div> <div class="footnote"> [248] Niles' Weekly Reg., April 25, 1829. Quoting from Del. Gazette of April 17. American Annual Register, 1827-8-9, Vol. III., p. 123. </div> <div class="footnote"> [249] Niles' Register, May 23, 1829. Note on P. Cannon. George Alfred Townsend wrote a romance of about 700 pages, entitled "The Entailed Hat, or Patty Cannon's Times," in which Patty Cannon is one of the principal characters. It is a very interesting and instructive story. Townsend was a native of Delaware and well qualified to write such a story. He says in the introduction: "Often had she told him of old Patty Cannon and her kidnapping den and her death in the jail of his native town. He found the legend of that dreaded woman had strengthened instead of having faded with time, and her haunts preserved, and eye witnesses of her deeds to be still living. "Hence, this romance has much local truth in it and is not only the narrative of an episode, but the story of a large region, comprehending three State jurisdictions." "'Patty Cannon's dead; they say she's took poison.' "A mighty pain seized the Chancellor's heart, and the loud groans he made called a stranger into the room. "'Is that dreadful woman dead?' sighed the Chancellor. "'Yes; she will never plague Delaware again. Marster.' "'God be thanked!' the old man groaned." "Entailed Hat," p. 541. </div> <div class="footnote"> [250] Liberator: Sept. 14, 1849; Jan. 10, 1835. </div> <div class="footnote"> [251] Niles' Register, April 10, 1824; Oct. 10, 1818. </div> <div class="footnote"> [252] Jessie Torrey: A Portraiture of Domestic Slavery, p. 57. </div> <div class="footnote"> [253] Ibid. </div> <div class="footnote"> [254] Francis Hall: Travels in Canada and the United States, p. 425. </div> </div> <hr class="chap" /> [Pg 96] <div style="break-after:column;"></div>

1 of 2

2 of 2

Update Required To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.