Sir Thomas More, son of Sir John More, a justice of the King’s
Bench, was born in 1478, in Milk Street, in the city of London.
After his earlier education at St. Anthony’s School, in Threadneedle
Street, he was placed, as a boy, in the household of Cardinal John Morton,
Archbishop of Canterbury and Lord Chancellor. It was not unusual
for persons of wealth or influence and sons of good families to be so
established together in a relation of patron and client. The youth
wore his patron’s livery, and added to his state. The patron
used, afterwards, his wealth or influence in helping his young client
forward in the world. Cardinal Morton had been in earlier days
that Bishop of Ely whom Richard III. sent to the Tower; was busy afterwards
in hostility to Richard; and was a chief adviser of Henry VII., who
in 1486 made him Archbishop of Canterbury, and nine months afterwards
Lord Chancellor. Cardinal Morton—of talk at whose table
there are recollections in “Utopia”—delighted in the
quick wit of young Thomas More. He once said, “Whoever shall
live to try it, shall see this child here waiting at table prove a notable
and rare man.”
At the age of about nineteen, Thomas More was sent to Canterbury
College, Oxford, by his patron, where he learnt Greek of the first men
who brought Greek studies from Italy to England—William Grocyn
and Thomas Linacre. Linacre, a physician, who afterwards took
orders, was also the founder of the College of Physicians. In
1499, More left Oxford to study law in London, at Lincoln’s Inn,
and in the next year Archbishop Morton died.
More’s earnest character caused him while studying law to aim
at the subduing of the flesh, by wearing a hair shirt, taking a log
for a pillow, and whipping himself on Fridays. At the age of twenty-one
he entered Parliament, and soon after he had been called to the bar
he was made Under-Sheriff of London. In 1503 he opposed in the
House of Commons Henry VII.’s proposal for a subsidy on account
of the marriage portion of his daughter Margaret; and he opposed with
so much energy that the House refused to grant it. One went and
told the king that a beardless boy had disappointed all his expectations.
During the last years, therefore, of Henry VII. More was under
the displeasure of the king, and had thoughts of leaving the country.
Henry VII. died in April, 1509, when More’s age was a little
over thirty. In the first years of the reign of Henry VIII. he
rose to large practice in the law courts, where it is said he refused
to plead in cases which he thought unjust, and took no fees from widows,
orphans, or the poor. He would have preferred marrying the second
daughter of John Colt, of New Hall, in Essex, but chose her elder sister,
that he might not subject her to the discredit of being passed over.
In 1513 Thomas More, still Under-Sheriff of London, is said to have
written his “History of the Life and Death of King Edward V.,
and of the Usurpation of Richard III.” The book, which seems
to contain the knowledge and opinions of More’s patron, Morton,
was not printed until 1557, when its writer had been twenty-two years
dead. It was then printed from a MS. in More’s handwriting.
In the year 1515 Wolsey, Archbishop of York, was made Cardinal by
Leo X.; Henry VIII. made him Lord Chancellor, and from that year until
1523 the King and the Cardinal ruled England with absolute authority,
and called no parliament. In May of the year 1515 Thomas More—not
knighted yet—was joined in a commission to the Low Countries with
Cuthbert Tunstal and others to confer with the ambassadors of Charles
V., then only Archduke of Austria, upon a renewal of alliance.
On that embassy More, aged about thirty-seven, was absent from England
for six months, and while at Antwerp he established friendship with
Peter Giles (Latinised Ægidius), a scholarly and courteous young
man, who was secretary to the municipality of Antwerp.
Cuthbert Tunstal was a rising churchman, chancellor to the Archbishop
of Canterbury, who in that year (1515) was made Archdeacon of Chester,
and in May of the next year (1516) Master of the Rolls. In 1516
he was sent again to the Low Countries, and More then went with him
to Brussels, where they were in close companionship with Erasmus.
More’s “Utopia” was written in Latin, and is in
two parts, of which the second, describing the place ([Greek text]—or
Nusquama, as he called it sometimes in his letters—“Nowhere”),
was probably written towards the close of 1515; the first part, introductory,
early in 1516. The book was first printed at Louvain, late in
1516, under the editorship of Erasmus, Peter Giles, and other of More’s
friends in Flanders. It was then revised by More, and printed
by Frobenius at Basle in November, 1518. It was reprinted at Paris
and Vienna, but was not printed in England during More’s lifetime.
Its first publication in this country was in the English translation,
made in Edward’s VI.’s reign (1551) by Ralph Robinson.
It was translated with more literary skill by Gilbert Burnet, in 1684,
soon after he had conducted the defence of his friend Lord William Russell,
attended his execution, vindicated his memory, and been spitefully deprived
by James II. of his lectureship at St. Clement’s. Burnet
was drawn to the translation of “Utopia” by the same sense
of unreason in high places that caused More to write the book.
Burnet’s is the translation given in this volume.
The name of the book has given an adjective to our language—we
call an impracticable scheme Utopian. Yet, under the veil of a
playful fiction, the talk is intensely earnest, and abounds in practical
suggestion. It is the work of a scholarly and witty Englishman,
who attacks in his own way the chief political and social evils of his
time. Beginning with fact, More tells how he was sent into Flanders
with Cuthbert Tunstal, “whom the king’s majesty of late,
to the great rejoicing of all men, did prefer to the office of Master
of the Rolls;” how the commissioners of Charles met them at Bruges,
and presently returned to Brussels for instructions; and how More then
went to Antwerp, where he found a pleasure in the society of Peter Giles
which soothed his desire to see again his wife and children, from whom
he had been four months away. Then fact slides into fiction with
the finding of Raphael Hythloday (whose name, made of two Greek words
[Greek text] and [Greek text], means “knowing in trifles”),
a man who had been with Amerigo Vespucci in the three last of the voyages
to the new world lately discovered, of which the account had been first
printed in 1507, only nine years before Utopia was written.
Designedly fantastic in suggestion of details, “Utopia”
is the work of a scholar who had read Plato’s “Republic,”
and had his fancy quickened after reading Plutarch’s account of
Spartan life under Lycurgus. Beneath the veil of an ideal communism,
into which there has been worked some witty extravagance, there lies
a noble English argument. Sometimes More puts the case as of France
when he means England. Sometimes there is ironical praise of the
good faith of Christian kings, saving the book from censure as a political
attack on the policy of Henry VIII. Erasmus wrote to a friend
in 1517 that he should send for More’s “Utopia,” if
he had not read it, and “wished to see the true source of all
political evils.” And to More Erasmus wrote of his book,
“A burgomaster of Antwerp is so pleased with it that he knows
it all by heart.”